There are marginal differences between the old and new CPU’s and as you can see there are marginal differences between all of the CPU’s as gaming performance relies more on the graphics card than the CPU. The new processors only offer marginal gains over the new tech, certainly not the potential 23% claim AMD make.Īt this end of the scale gaming performance is relatively unchanged. Same story applies to testing in Cinebench. These are the results from a synthetic benchmark Īs you can see, the FX-8350 is not much faster than the old FX-8150 and the FX-6300 is not exactly destroying the older FX-6100. It was like people ordering a pizza only to find the only topping available was ice cream so it’s not really a surprise to see these processors available for PC’s and Custom PC’s so soon.ĪMD Claim they are “up to” 23% faster than the old Bulldozer series, this is one hell of a claim. The Bulldozer launch was a little flaccid. Normally processors have a little longer shelf life however it’s not uncommon for a Intel or AMD CPU line up to be replaced within a year. Looking at the price points, the FX-8350 will replace the FX-8150, the FX-8320 will supersede the FX-8120, the FX-6300 will take the place of the FX-6100 and the FX-4170 and FX-4100 will be shown the door by the FX-4300. If it’s a 3 then it’s one of the new CPU’s. They are faster and cheaper than their older counterparts so it’s expected they will simply replace the older CPU’s.įairly easily, take a look at the second number in the model number. In short, 4 new processors that is essentially a revision upgrade to the existing AM3+ FX Bulldozer range. To solve their boredom, out comes a revision of the AMD FX Range shortly after the new low end A-Series CPU’s. AMD has been a little quiet as of late – The current range of AMD FX CPU’s were released just over a year ago and the AMD/ATI 7 series graphics cards were around towards the end of Q1 earlier this year.

Old bulldozer game computer